FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)

The war in Ukraine and the restrictive measures imposed on Russia and Belarus by the European Union inevitably disrupt the normal functioning of economic and financial activities, with a direct impact on financial mechanisms, which may lead to difficulties in managing risks and in ensuring/maintaining normal operating conditions for entities/companies in many sectors.
In this situation, both those charged with governance and statutory auditors or audit firms must give increased attention to analysing exposure to going concern risk and the implications for the annual financial statements and, consequently, for the audit report.
The following matters should therefore be considered:
- The impact of these events on market conditions may affect the financial statements for the financial year ended 31 December 2021, particularly as regards the application of the going concern basis. For reporting entities whose financial year differs from the calendar year, it must be analysed in particular whether the events occurred during the reporting year and whether adjustments to the amounts reported in the financial statements are needed (e.g. impairment of assets, fair value estimates, impairment adjustments, etc.).
- Given the increased risk of cyber attacks, statutory auditors/audit firms should communicate with management and those charged with governance about any changes in the entity’s assessment of this risk, including in relation to financial reporting, and understand whether they intend to change the processes, structures and safeguards put in place to mitigate the risks identified. This understanding may be particularly important for entities that, by the nature of their activity, can significantly affect a jurisdiction’s infrastructure and may therefore be at greater risk of such an attack (e.g. entities in banking/financial services, defence, aerospace and commercial airlines, energy and transport).
Where a cyber incident is found to have occurred, statutory auditors/audit firms should:
‒ Involve IT audit specialists in the engagement team, if not already involved;
‒ Notify the management of the audited entity and, where a significant breach or exposure is identified, communicate with those charged with governance;
‒ Obtain an understanding of the incident and assess its effect on the audit approach;
‒ Evaluate management’s analysis of the incident’s effect on the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements (e.g. related contingent liabilities and receivables arising from the actual incident), the effects of potential non-compliance with laws and regulations, the impact on cash flows and projected future cash flows (which may trigger impairment) and the adequacy of the disclosures in the financial statements.
- Other information (ISA 720 (Revised)) accompanying the financial statements (e.g. the directors’ report) may include a description of the risks arising from the conflict in Ukraine and/or the current economic outlook in general.
When reading the directors’ report, the statutory auditor/audit firm considers whether there is a material inconsistency between this other information and the financial statements or the auditor’s knowledge obtained in the audit. This includes checking the consistency of the information in the directors’ report with the financial statements, including additional disclosures, and with the underlying assumptions and judgements (e.g. whether the information in the directors’ report on the effect of the conflict in Ukraine on the entity is consistent with the disclosure of subsequent events and with the assumptions used by management in its updated going concern assessment).
According to a report by S&P (Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings), the economic implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine include:
- Energy supply disruptions or significant price fluctuations, particularly in Europe.
- Europe’s ability to quickly find alternatives to Russian gas.
- Inflationary pressures in economies through rising energy, food and metal prices.
- Escalating cyber attacks and counter-attacks between Russia and its known or potential adversaries.
- Risk repricing leading to higher borrowing costs or restricted access to funding for weaker borrowers.
- Lower profits for energy-intensive sectors or those reliant on discretionary consumer spending.
The S&P report can be accessed here: https://www.spglobal.com/_assets/documents/ratings/research/101248235.pdf.
These economic implications may affect the following financial statement items:
This context, on the one hand, increases the responsibility of those charged with corporate governance for as realistic an assessment as possible of the ability to continue as a going concern and of the implications for the information in the financial statements and, on the other, requires a review of audit risk and, where applicable, the inclusion of relevant information on this matter in the audit report.
Government authorities, market participants, investors and business partners need detailed, sector-specific information in order to make economic decisions.
In this situation, we must draw attention to the importance statutory auditors should attach to audit risk exposure, especially in view of the direct implications for the audited companies’ compliance with the going concern basis, with direct reference to the presentation of the financial statements at 31 December 2021.
We recommend that statutory auditors and audit firms carefully analyse the impact of going concern risk and its implications for the application of the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements under audit, whether or not the entities are public-interest entities.
Statutory auditors/audit firms must also properly document the work performed in assessing the threat to going concern, covering at least the following:
- The sufficiency of the measures taken by the management of the audited entity to reduce going concern risk, including those relating to reorganisation, cessation of activity or liquidation, if there is no realistic alternative.
In applying ISA 560 “Subsequent Events”, we recommend adequate documentation of the matters that may affect going concern.
Where there are uncertainties regarding the going concern basis and/or adjustments to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, these will be presented to the audited entity in the list of proposed adjustments, discussed in communications with it and included in the audit documentation.
ISA 560 “Subsequent Events” requires the inclusion in the annual financial statements at 31 December 2021 of directly affected entities of detailed disclosure notes on the impact of this situation on the company and on the application of the going concern basis in preparing the annual financial statements. In this way, users of the financial statements can assess the implications or become aware of the effects on the entity itself and on the economy in general.
Even where Key Audit Matters (KAM) must be included in the audit report, ISA 701 “Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report” provides that:
“A matter giving rise to a modified opinion in accordance with ISA 705 (Revised), or a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with ISA 570 (Revised), is by its nature a key audit matter.
However, in such circumstances, these matters shall not be described in the “Key Audit Matters” section of the auditor’s report, and the requirements in paragraphs 13–14 do not apply.
Rather, the auditor shall:
(a) Report on this matter or these matters in accordance with the applicable ISA(s); and
(b) Include in the Key Audit Matters section a reference to the “Basis for Qualified (Adverse) Opinion” section or the “Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern” section.”
Several situations may therefore arise; we give a selection of examples of how to approach them:
|
1. The financial statements contain an explanatory note on subsequent events detailing the risks and the measures taken by the company, and there is significant uncertainty about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the auditor has concluded that the use of the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements is appropriate. |
The audit report will be affected by the inclusion, in accordance with ISA 570 “Going Concern”, of a section “Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern” [1], referring to the relevant explanatory note in the financial statements. |
| 2. The financial statements do not contain an explanatory note on subsequent events detailing the measures taken by the company, and there is significant uncertainty about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the auditor has concluded that the use of the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements is appropriate. | The audit report will include in the basis for opinion a remark on the material going concern uncertainty and will modify the audit opinion accordingly by issuing a qualified or adverse audit opinion. |
| 3. The financial statements contain an explanatory note on subsequent events detailing the measures taken by the company, and there is no significant uncertainty about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern | The audit report may be affected by including an Emphasis of Matter paragraph drawing attention to this matter, without affecting the audit opinion on the financial statements at 31 December 2021. [2] |
| 4. The financial statements do not contain an explanatory note on subsequent events detailing the measures taken by the company, and there is NO there is significant uncertainty about the about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. | The audit report is not modified in this respect. |
| 5. The financial statements have not been prepared on a going concern basis, and the auditor has concluded that not applying the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements is appropriate. | The audit report will include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph on this. |
| 6. The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, and the auditor has concluded that applying the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements is not appropriate. | The audit report will include an adverse opinion. |
| 7. Multiple material uncertainties about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern | The audit report will include a disclaimer of opinion |
[1] EXAMPLE – TEMPLATE
Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern
(NOTE: only if applicable/to be adapted to the specific situation)
We draw attention to Note XX in the financial statements, which indicates that the Company estimates that the impact of the disruption in raw material supplies and of rising raw material and energy prices in the current year resulted in an operating loss of XXX, which significantly affected the Company’s equity and operating cash flows for the current year, reducing the predictability of budgets for the following period. As stated in Note XX, these events and the restrictions imposed in 2022, together with the other matters set out in Note XX, indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The management of the Group/Company has taken steps to secure financing for the next 12 months and, according to management’s representation, going concern is ensured for this period. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
[1] EXAMPLE – TEMPLATE
Emphasis of Matter paragraph related to going concern
(NOTE: only if applicable/to be adapted to the specific situation)
We draw attention to Note XX in the financial statements, which indicates that the Company estimates that the impact of the disruption in raw material supplies and of rising raw material and energy prices in the current year resulted in an operating loss of XXX, which significantly affected the Company’s equity and the entity’s operating cash flows for the current year. According to management’s representation, the entity took the necessary measures in the current period by increasing sales prices and securing short-term financing to ensure operational continuity, so no significant difficulties affecting going concern are expected for at least 12 months from the date of the financial statements. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
[1] https://www.iasplus.com/en-ca/news/part-i-ifrs/january-2021/close-call-going-concern-assessments
Other possible implications for the audit report could be:
- the inclusion of a key audit matter (for example a “close-call”[3]);
- an Emphasis of Matter paragraph: for example, a significant subsequent event disclosed in the financial statements, or the significant risk arising from uncertainty over energy or commodity price movements for businesses highly exposed to this risk or potentially exposed to future sanctions.
In any of these situations, the statutory auditor/audit firm is advised to maintain professional scepticism, request additional information on the going concern risk assessment, analyse how the company assessed the risk and the considerations management took into account in its risk assessment, obtain a written representation from management to this effect, analyse all the information gathered during the audit engagement and assess, at the date of the audit report, on the basis of professional judgement and the information available, whether the use of the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements under audit is appropriate.
We wish you every success in your work!
Duration of the audit engagement – Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014
A: As provided for in Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, the minimum duration of an audit engagement is 1 year and it may be renewed. Neither the initial engagement of a particular statutory auditor or audit firm, nor this in combination with any renewed engagements, may exceed a maximum duration of 10 years.
A: Under Article 71(2) of Law No 162/2017: “In accordance with Article 17(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, the maximum duration referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 may be extended to a maximum of:
a) 20 years, where a public tendering process for the statutory audit is conducted in accordance with Article 16(2) to (5) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 and takes effect upon the expiry of the maximum duration referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 17(1).”
b) or 24 years (under Article 17(4)(b)), where more than one statutory auditor or audit firm is engaged simultaneously after the expiry of the maximum durations referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 17(1) and in Article 17(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, provided that the statutory audit results in the presentation of the joint audit report referred to in Article 28 of Directive 2006/43/EC.
For such exceptions, we recommend submitting a request for extension stating the reason why the extension of the audit engagement is sought. ASPAAS will analyse the request and inform the statutory auditor or audit firm of its decision to accept or reject the extension of the audit engagement.
A: Under Article 17(8) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, the duration of the audit engagement is calculated from the first financial year covered in the audit engagement letter in which the statutory auditor or audit firm was first appointed to carry out consecutive statutory audits for the same public-interest entity.
A: Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 lays down specific requirements regarding the statutory audit of public-interest entities, and Article 71 of Law No 162/2017 clarifies certain aspects of its application. Consequently, Article 71 of Law No 162/2017 refers only to public-interest entities.
Letter No 781/17.05.2018:
A: The letter is addressed to all statutory auditors/audit firms that carried out statutory audit engagements (PIE and non-PIE) in Romania during 2017, for annual financial statements for the year ended 31.12.2016.
This request for information is addressed only to statutory auditors or audit firms that carried out statutory audit engagements and issued an audit report, NOT also to those acting as subcontractors;
Statutory auditors/audit firms that do not meet the above conditions, i.e. that have NOT carried out statutory audits in the period referred to in the letter 781/17.05.2018, need only send an email to office@aspaas.gov.ro, identifying themselves by certificate/registration number and informing the authority that they have NOT carried out statutory audits.
The aim is to create a database of information on statutory auditors/audit firms and to identify all companies subject to statutory audit that fall within the scope of Law No 162/2017.
A: An audit engagement falls within the scope of Law No 162/2017 if it is a statutory audit as defined in Article 2(1) of Law No 162/2017.
Article 2(1)(b) of Law No 162/2017 is interpreted having regard also to Article 185 of Companies Law No 31/1990, republished, as amended and supplemented.
A: Yes, under Article 29(14) of Law No 162/2017, statutory auditors and audit firms carrying out statutory audits must provide ASPAAS, annually or whenever necessary, with a report on their statutory audit activity containing at least information similar to that set out in Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014.
Please also note that, under Article 29(16) of Law No 162/2017, failure by statutory auditors and audit firms to provide ASPAAS with a report on their statutory audit activity, or any other information on how they perform their legal obligations and duties in statutory audit work, constitutes an administrative breach and is sanctioned under Article 40(4)(a) to (d).
R: Point 1(a) must include a description of the legal form, the names of the owners of the audit firm with their share of the capital, and the positions they hold within the firm.
R: Point 1(b) applies only to audit firms or statutory auditors that belong to a network. If the auditor or audit firm does not belong to any network, point 1(b) need not be completed.
Where the firm belongs to a network, the following apply, in line with the template in Annex 1:
- Point i. – a general description of the network to which the audit firm belongs (possibly a general diagram of the network)
- Points ii. and iii. – these two points can be combined in a single table showing the name and country of operation of the audit firms/auditors in the reporting auditor’s network (including you or your firm).
Point iv. – the total turnover of the network.
R: Point 1(f) must contain the list with the full name (including tax ID) of the entities at which a statutory audit (PIE or non-PIE) was carried out during 2017, for annual financial statements for the year ended 31.12.2016, in xls format, in line with the template in Annex 2.
Our aim is to identify all entities subject to statutory audit, and for this we need your support in reporting the entities you audit as completely as possible.
Please note that under this point we do not wish to know the audit fee, but we insist on receiving the full name of all audited entities that qualify for statutory audit under the law, stating whether or not it is a PIE statutory audit.
R: For point 1(i), please note that we do not wish to know individual remuneration, only the basis for partners’ remuneration.
R: For point 1(k), revenue must be broken down in line with the template in Annex 3, as follows:
i. revenue from statutory audit contracts at PIEs,
ii. revenue from statutory audit contracts at entities other than public-interest entities,
iii. revenue from permitted non-audit services (for this point, see Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 on prohibited non-audit services) provided to audited entities.
iv. revenue from non-audit services provided to other entities that are not audited by the firm.
Note: For efficiency, we ask all auditors/audit firms that carried out statutory audit engagements in the requested period to send us the information under this point, regardless of whether it was published in their financial statements for the previous financial year or in their annual report to CAFR.
A: For the list under point 2, please use the table template in Annex 4.
OMFP No 10/2019
Answer:
Point 2.6(3) and (4) of Annex 1 to OMFP No 10/2019 states:
“(3) Medium-sized and large entities and public-interest entities prepare annual financial statements in the format set out in point 21 of the Accounting Regulations approved by Order of the Minister of Public Finance No 1802/2014, as amended and supplemented. Those annual financial statements are subject to statutory audit.
(4) Entities that, at the balance sheet date, exceed the limits of at least two of the following three criteria are also subject to audit:
a) total assets: RON 16,000,000;
b) net turnover: RON 32,000,000;
c) average number of employees during the financial year: 50.
The audit obligation for the entities referred to in this paragraph applies when they exceed those limits in two consecutive financial years.”
Section 1.3 of OMFP No 1802/2014 specifies:
- – (1) Where, at the balance sheet date, an entity exceeds or ceases to exceed the limits of two of the three criteria referred to in point 9, this affects the application of the derogations provided for in these regulations only if this occurs in two consecutive financial years.
- – (1) An entity assesses on an ongoing basis, at each balance sheet date, whether it has exceeded or ceased to exceed the relevant size criteria.
(2) An entity changes category only if it exceeds or ceases to exceed the size criteria in two consecutive financial years. Consequently, a change in the size criteria does not automatically place the entity in a new category.”
It follows from the above that an entity is audited according to the size criterion. In line with the principle of consistency, an entity should be audited on the same basis on which it falls within the size criteria set by OMFP No 1802/2014.
We hope this has answered your questions and assure you of our full cooperation and commitment on matters concerning statutory audit.
Statutory audit
Answer: Under Article 2(1) of Law No 162/2017: ” Statutory audit means an audit of individual annual financial statements or consolidated annual financial statements carried out in accordance with the international auditing standards within the meaning of Article 32, insofar as it:
a) is required by European Union law or national law;
b) is carried out voluntarily at small entities, and the audited financial statements are published together with the statutory audit report, in accordance with the law”
Consequently, under point a) above, a statutory audit is the audit of all financial statements that is required by European Union law or national law.




